The Economic Nationalist

The anti-American, left-wing wench Joan Walsh writes recently in Salon,

I was on “Hardball” today talking about the climate of extreme right-wing rhetoric today, and whether it had anything to do with Wednesday’s tragic shooting at Washington’s Holocaust Museum, or the May 31 murder of Dr. George Tiller by an antiabortion crackpot.

Let’s get this straight. The psychopathic Dr. Tiller was a cold-blooded serial murderer who delighted in full-term abortions so gruesome that even his colleagues in the abortion trade found themselves too squeamish to execute the infernal procedure. It is thankfully not given to this writer to judge whether a radical abortionist deserves to die but, if Miss Walsh came to the Economic Nationalist for affirmation that the likes of Dr. Tiller deserved to live, then she would have come to the wrong place. If Dr. Tiller was not a very monster, distinguishable from Stalin principally only in the scale of his opportunity to spill innocent blood, then this writer does not know what a monster is.

As Ann Coulter has observed, the U.S. abortion profession has aborted 49 million since Roe v. Wade, 1973, whereas antiabortion zealots have claimed the lives of precisely five abortionists during that time. It seems rather fair to observe that the abortionists have had the upper hand.

Now, a disastrously but honestly mistaken case can be made for abortion, and this writer does not advocate vigilante slayings of abortionists. (Does he condemn vigilante slayings of abortionists, therefore? Answer: no comment. By refusing to answer such mischief this writer will cordially decline to dance to the puppet-strings of the liberal left. The leftist who asks such a sordid question, which does not merit the dignity of a reply, can go carry his own filthy water, as it were, for this writer will not do it for him. Let the leftist condemn, if that’s what he wants. What this writer wants to know is why the left is so fond of killing babies.) To use the exceedingly rare but maybe well deserved fate of the monster Dr. Tiller as an excuse to implicate a nonexistent, extreme right-wing cabal however is a bit rich.

Miss Walsh however seems determined to implicate.

I tried to choose my words carefully. Unless it’s shown that either man had accomplices, we have to be clear that the men responsible for those murders are the ones who pulled the trigger.

Fair enough.

Still, it’s hard not to think about the extreme right-wing rhetoric, especially about Barack Obama, and whether it could conceivably lead to more right-wing violence.

Come again? On which alternate earth does Miss Walsh live? A black man rapes a white woman every fifteen minutes in the United States, and Miss Walsh is worried that the remarkably isolated crime of some 88-year old Nazi crackpot indicated a dangerous trend! That white woman could be my wife, sister or daughter, none of whom is busily engaged in trashing the American social order as Miss Walsh is.

I’ll tell you what, Miss Walsh. As a matter of academic interest, I for one will be prepared to discuss with you the acknowledged propensity of some, exceedingly rare white men “to go Postal” in the context of a society that has generally gone insane, once you have begun to devote proportionally commensurate column-inches to the epidemic of black-on-white rape. Then will I start to listen to you on topic of the imaginary danger of the so-called “extreme right wing.” So, get to work, lassie! You’ve got a lot of writing to do.

HJH

[Isn’t it disrespectful to call the woman lassie? Well, yes, that’s the point, isn’t it? When someone can explain to me how a woman who seeks to destroy everything I and mine hold dear, who pitilessly unleashes on us all the fury of imagined public scorn, whose feminist world-view would condemn tens of millions of innocent children to long sentences in the dark prison of day care (when it would let the children live at all), who doesn’t seem interested in the aforementioned rape epidemic so long as she can sap some man’s (and his wife’s) honest family wage to get government-enforced equal pay for “equal work,” deserves the respect normally, defaultedly to be accorded her sex—or better, when the woman repents—then I will apologize. Chivalry confers mostly privileges but also some responsibilities upon the fair sex. Lassie and wench ain’t very high on the insult scale, for the real insult would be to class this wench with good women who are not hell-bent on devastating civil society. By my language, I am showing restraint (unlike by David Letterman’s language about the Palin family, for instance). And no, I would not say it to her face, but let some feminized man then confront me to defend this woman’s honor in absentia, and he just might find out about the effect of an “extreme right-wing” sock between the eyes. After the unending torrent of abuse the good women on our side have withstood from the likes of this woman and of her promiscuous male enablers, the latter giggling behind her pantsuit, why, I think that I shall stand my ground. —Howard—]

[Update: It is not denied that many dutiful parents, or at least parents whose hearts are right, use day care because they have no practical alternative. We do what we must, we do the best we can, as our own parents did before us. Kids are resilient, but the comment wasn’t about good people making do. The comment was about the liberal unethic that callously dismisses normal family life as a matter of course. —Howard—]

This entry was posted on Thursday, June 18th, 2009 at 12:19 pm and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.