<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: William Hawkins</title>
	<link>http://econnat.us/2007/07/william-hawkins/</link>
	<description>Pride goeth before a fall.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 05:43:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Mitch/Redoubt10</title>
		<link>http://econnat.us/2007/07/william-hawkins/#comment-2315</link>
		<author>Mitch/Redoubt10</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 09:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://econnat.us/2007/07/william-hawkins/#comment-2315</guid>
		<description>Good rah-rah article...Hawkins is eloquent as always in bashing globalism. However, he gets it wrong that the proponents of the 'harmony of interests' were " classical liberals". The phrase was coined by Henry Carey in the 19th Century who went to pains to contrast his national-system economics with that of the British-Manchester one of laissez-faire, which is classical liberalism. Economic-nationalism is neo-mercantilist in foundation, something that classical liberalism holds as anthema.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good rah-rah article&#8230;Hawkins is eloquent as always in bashing globalism. However, he gets it wrong that the proponents of the &#8216;harmony of interests&#8217; were &#8221; classical liberals&#8221;. The phrase was coined by Henry Carey in the 19th Century who went to pains to contrast his national-system economics with that of the British-Manchester one of laissez-faire, which is classical liberalism. Economic-nationalism is neo-mercantilist in foundation, something that classical liberalism holds as anthema.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
